↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era
Published in
Nature, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1401-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Neukom, Nathan Steiger, Juan José Gómez-Navarro, Jianghao Wang, Johannes P. Werner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,643 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 422 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 22%
Researcher 70 17%
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Professor 24 6%
Other 79 19%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 97 23%
Environmental Science 65 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Physics and Astronomy 14 3%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 109 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#426
of 16,304,498 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#56
of 76,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 263,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,304,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.