↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 72,695)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era
Published in
Nature, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1401-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Neukom, Nathan Steiger, Juan José Gómez-Navarro, Jianghao Wang, Johannes P. Werner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,702 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 22%
Researcher 62 18%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Other 20 6%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 53 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 76 22%
Environmental Science 54 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Physics and Astronomy 12 4%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 86 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#171
of 14,575,084 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33
of 72,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 255,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,575,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.