↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 74,593)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era
Published in
Nature, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1401-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Neukom, Nathan Steiger, Juan José Gómez-Navarro, Jianghao Wang, Johannes P. Werner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,668 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 381 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 23%
Researcher 66 17%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Other 22 6%
Other 74 19%
Unknown 64 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 86 23%
Environmental Science 59 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Physics and Astronomy 13 3%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 100 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#305
of 15,418,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42
of 74,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 259,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,418,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.