You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Process evaluation in the field: global learnings from seven implementation research hypertension projects in low-and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7261-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felix Limbani, Jane Goudge, Rohina Joshi, Marion A. Maar, J. Jaime Miranda, Brian Oldenburg, Gary Parker, Maria Amalia Pesantes, Michaela A. Riddell, Abdul Salam, Kathy Trieu, Amanda G. Thrift, Josefien Van Olmen, Rajesh Vedanthan, Ruth Webster, Karen Yeates, Jacqui Webster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,534,842
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,897
of 15,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,742
of 345,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#183
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.