You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing dogs in ape-like conditions: the effect of a barrier on dogs’ performance on the object-choice task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01297-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Clark, David A. Leavens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 49% |
| Scientists | 18 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Psychology | 5 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,408,922
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#322
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,742
of 352,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.