↓ Skip to main content

Invasive Lionfish Drive Atlantic Coral Reef Fish Declines

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
23 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invasive Lionfish Drive Atlantic Coral Reef Fish Declines
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J. Green, John L. Akins, Aleksandra Maljković, Isabelle M. Côté

Abstract

Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles) have spread swiftly across the Western Atlantic, producing a marine predator invasion of unparalleled speed and magnitude. There is growing concern that lionfish will affect the structure and function of invaded marine ecosystems, however detrimental impacts on natural communities have yet to be measured. Here we document the response of native fish communities to predation by lionfish populations on nine coral reefs off New Providence Island, Bahamas. We assessed lionfish diet through stomach contents analysis, and quantified changes in fish biomass through visual surveys of lionfish and native fishes at the sites over time. Lionfish abundance increased rapidly between 2004 and 2010, by which time lionfish comprised nearly 40% of the total predator biomass in the system. The increase in lionfish abundance coincided with a 65% decline in the biomass of the lionfish's 42 Atlantic prey fishes in just two years. Without prompt action to control increasing lionfish populations, similar effects across the region may have long-term negative implications for the structure of Atlantic marine communities, as well as the societies and economies that depend on them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
Unknown 441 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 124 27%
Student > Master 82 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Researcher 52 11%
Other 19 4%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206 45%
Environmental Science 107 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 22 5%
Unknown 94 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#160,045
of 25,124,631 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,400
of 217,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#601
of 161,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#26
of 3,551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,124,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.