The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selective area growth and stencil lithography for in situ fabricated quantum devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41565-019-0506-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Schüffelgen, Daniel Rosenbach, Chuan Li, Tobias W. Schmitt, Michael Schleenvoigt, Abdur R. Jalil, Sarah Schmitt, Jonas Kölzer, Meng Wang, Benjamin Bennemann, Umut Parlak, Lidia Kibkalo, Stefan Trellenkamp, Thomas Grap, Doris Meertens, Martina Luysberg, Gregor Mussler, Erwin Berenschot, Niels Tas, Alexander A. Golubov, Alexander Brinkman, Thomas Schäpers, Detlev Grützmacher |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 28% |
| Researcher | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 46 | 48% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,264,417
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#1,080
of 3,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,947
of 346,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#23
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.