You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® Depression Item Bank: an illustration of classical test theory methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-019-0127-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Nolte, Cheryl Coon, Stacie Hudgens, Mathilde G. E. Verdam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,686,631
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#395
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,922
of 346,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.