↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® Depression Item Bank: an illustration of classical test theory methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® Depression Item Bank: an illustration of classical test theory methods
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0127-0
Authors

Sandra Nolte, Cheryl Coon, Stacie Hudgens, Mathilde G. E. Verdam

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Mathematics 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 7 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,356,930
of 15,549,197 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#149
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,969
of 261,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,197 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them