↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Backbone Regiochemistry on Conductivity, Charge Density, and Polaron Structure of n-Doped Donor–Acceptor Polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry of Materials, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Backbone Regiochemistry on Conductivity, Charge Density, and Polaron Structure of n-Doped Donor–Acceptor Polymers
Published in
Chemistry of Materials, April 2019
DOI 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suhao Wang, Daniele Fazzi, Yuttapoom Puttisong, Mohammad J. Jafari, Zhihua Chen, Thomas Ederth, Jens W. Andreasen, Weimin M. Chen, Antonio Facchetti, Simone Fabiano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,740,305
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry of Materials
#5,924
of 7,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,773
of 192,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry of Materials
#55
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.