↓ Skip to main content

Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002217.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Nevitt, Catrin Tudur Smith, Anthony G Marson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 46 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,901,560
of 23,368,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,527
of 12,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,959
of 346,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,368,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.