↓ Skip to main content

Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002217.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Nevitt, Catrin Tudur Smith, Anthony G Marson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 23%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,756,561
of 14,110,335 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,482
of 10,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,491
of 253,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.