↓ Skip to main content

Protein hydrolysate versus standard formula for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein hydrolysate versus standard formula for preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012412.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek Hang Cheong Ng, Joel RL Klassen, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 22%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,448,085
of 16,555,656 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,737
of 11,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,064
of 264,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,555,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.