↓ Skip to main content

Selective Versus Nonselective His Bundle Pacing Does it Matter? ∗

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective Versus Nonselective His Bundle Pacing Does it Matter? ∗
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.05.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santosh K. Padala, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#911
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,743
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.