↓ Skip to main content

The relative effectiveness of seed addition methods for restoring or re-creating species rich grasslands: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relative effectiveness of seed addition methods for restoring or re-creating species rich grasslands: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0174-2
Authors

Daniel Slodowicz, Jean-Yves Humbert, Raphaël Arlettaz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Environmental Science 13 23%
Linguistics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,597,568
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#198
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,304
of 350,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.