↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of ecotechnologies for recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate and effectiveness of the recovery products as fertilisers: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of ecotechnologies for recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate and effectiveness of the recovery products as fertilisers: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0173-3
Authors

Biljana Macura, Solveig L. Johannesdottir, Mikołaj Piniewski, Neal R. Haddaway, Elisabeth Kvarnström

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 30%
Environmental Science 12 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,749,542
of 14,498,785 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#135
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,742
of 255,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,498,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them