↓ Skip to main content

Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Haematology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors
Published in
The Lancet Haematology, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30106-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Kaptoge, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Carmel Moore, Matthew Walker, Jane Armitage, Willem H Ouwehand, David J Roberts, John Danesh, Simon G Thompson, Stephen Kaptoge, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Carmel Moore, Matthew Walker, Jane Armitage, Willem H Ouwehand, David J Roberts, John Danesh, Simon G Thompson, Jenny Donovan, Ian Ford, Rachel Henry, Beverley J Hunt, Bridget le Huray, Susan Mehenny, Gail Miflin, Jane Green, Mike Stredder, Nicholas A Watkins, Alan McDermott, Clive Ronaldson, Claire Thomson, Zoe Tolkien, Lorna Williamson, David Allan, Jennifer Sambrook, Tracey Hammerton, David Bruce, Fizzah Choudry, Cedric Ghvaert, Kirstie Jonston, Anne Kelly, Andrew King, Alfred Mo, Lizanne Page, Penny Richardson, Peter Senior, Yagnesh Umrania, Henna Wong, Brendan Burchell, John Gallacher, Gavin Murphy, Adrian C Newland, Keith Wheatley, Michael Greaves, Marc Turner, Tahir Aziz, Richard Brain, Christine Davies, Ruth Turner, Paula Wakeman, Alison Dent, Alan Wakeman, Ben Anthony, Desmond Bland, Willem H Parrondo, Helen Vincent, Candy Weatherill, Andrea Forsyth, Carol Butterfield, Tracey Wright, Karen Ellis, Kristie Johnston, Pat Poynton, Carolyn Brooks, Emma Martin, Lara Littler, Lindsay Williamson, Donna Blair, Karen Ackerley, Lynn Woods, Sophie Stanley, Gemma Walsh, Gayle Franklin, Cheryl Howath, Sarah Sharpe, Deborah Smith, Lauren Botham, Caroline Williams, Claire Alexander, Gareth Sowerbutts, Diane Furnival, Michael Thake, Shilpa Patel, Carolyn Roost, Sandra Sowerby, Mary Joy Appleton, Eileen Bays, Geoff Bowyer, Steven Clarkson, Stuart Halson, Kate Holmes, Gareth Humphreys, Lee Parvin-Cooper, Jason Towler, Joanne Addy, Patrica Barrass, Louise Stennett, Susan Burton, Hannah Dingwell, Victoria Clarke, Maria Potton, Thomas Bolton, Michael Daynes, Stuart Halson, Sarah Spackman, Michael Walker, Abudu Momodu, James Fenton, Adam King, Omer Muhammad, Nicholas Oates, Tim Peakman, Christine Ryan, Kristian Spreckley, Craig Stubbins, Joanna Williams, James Brannan, Cedric Mochon, Samantha Taylor, Kimberly Warren, Stephen Kaptoge, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Jonathan Mant, Willem H Ouwehand, Simon G Thompson, John Danesh, David J Roberts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Sports and Recreations 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,037,743
of 16,042,084 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#172
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,393
of 263,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,042,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.