The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corticosteroid therapy in refractory shock following cardiac arrest: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1257-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W. Donnino, Lars W. Andersen, Katherine M. Berg, Maureen Chase, Robert Sherwin, Howard Smithline, Erin Carney, Long Ngo, Parth V. Patel, Xiaowen Liu, Donald Cutlip, Peter Zimetbaum, Michael N. Cocchi, the collaborating authors from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center’s Center for Resuscitation Science Research Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 33% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#990,726
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#750
of 6,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,899
of 316,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.