You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Usefulness of the Delay Alternating with Nutation for Tailored Excitation Pulse with T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolution in the Detection of Cerebral Metastases: Comparison with MPRAGE Imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a6158 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
D. Kim, Y.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, J.-Y. Han, J.Y. Lee, S.-C. Jin, H.J. Baek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 50% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,493,682
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2,082
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,987
of 346,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#55
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.