↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of the African Women Awareness of CANcer (AWACAN) tool for breast and cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of the African Women Awareness of CANcer (AWACAN) tool for breast and cervical cancer
Published in
PLoS ONE, August 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220545
Authors

J. Moodley, S. E. Scott, A. D. Mwaka, D. Constant, J. N. Githaiga, T. S. Stewart, A. Payne, L. Cairncross, N. I. M. Somdyala, F. M. Walter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,826,905
of 15,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#26,391
of 155,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,820
of 262,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#51
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.