↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics Threaten Wildlife: Circulating Quinolone Residues and Disease in Avian Scavengers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics Threaten Wildlife: Circulating Quinolone Residues and Disease in Avian Scavengers
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Á. Lemus, Guillermo Blanco, Javier Grande, Bernardo Arroyo, Marino García-Montijano, Felíx Martínez

Abstract

Antibiotic residues that may be present in carcasses of medicated livestock could pass to and greatly reduce scavenger wildlife populations. We surveyed residues of the quinolones enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin and other antibiotics (amoxicillin and oxytetracycline) in nestling griffon Gyps fulvus, cinereous Aegypius monachus and Egyptian Neophron percnopterus vultures in central Spain. We found high concentrations of antibiotics in the plasma of many nestling cinereous (57%) and Egyptian (40%) vultures. Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were also found in liver samples of all dead cinereous vultures. This is the first report of antibiotic residues in wildlife. We also provide evidence of a direct association between antibiotic residues, primarily quinolones, and severe disease due to bacterial and fungal pathogens. Our results indicate that, by damaging the liver and kidney and through the acquisition and proliferation of pathogens associated with the depletion of lymphoid organs, continuous exposure to antibiotics could increase mortality rates, at least in cinereous vultures. If antibiotics ingested with livestock carrion are clearly implicated in the decline of the vultures in central Spain then it should be considered a primary concern for conservation of their populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Other 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 44%
Environmental Science 22 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,539,240
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,984
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,546
of 154,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#34
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.