↓ Skip to main content

Utility of hemoglobin A1c in detecting risk of type 2 diabetes: comparison of hemoglobin A1c with other biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 336)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of hemoglobin A1c in detecting risk of type 2 diabetes: comparison of hemoglobin A1c with other biomarkers
Published in
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, January 2019
DOI 10.3164/jcbn.19-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aya Umeno, Yasukazu Yoshida

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#830,108
of 13,435,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#18
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,220
of 179,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,435,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them