↓ Skip to main content

eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012379.pub2
Authors

Jessica K Stevenson, Zoe C Campbell, Angela C Webster, Clara K Chow, Allison Tong, Jonathan C Craig, Katrina L Campbell, Vincent WS Lee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#862,197
of 13,407,861 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,726
of 10,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,180
of 165,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,407,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.