You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Control Centrality and Hierarchical Structure in Complex Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0044459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang-Yu Liu, Jean-Jacques Slotine, Albert-László Barabási |
| Abstract |
We introduce the concept of control centrality to quantify the ability of a single node to control a directed weighted network. We calculate the distribution of control centrality for several real networks and find that it is mainly determined by the network's degree distribution. We show that in a directed network without loops the control centrality of a node is uniquely determined by its layer index or topological position in the underlying hierarchical structure of the network. Inspired by the deep relation between control centrality and hierarchical structure in a general directed network, we design an efficient attack strategy against the controllability of malicious networks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 277 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 33% |
| Researcher | 61 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 53 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 16% |
| Engineering | 49 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 23% |
| Unknown | 45 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,529,246
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,811
of 221,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,293
of 190,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#501
of 4,436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.