↓ Skip to main content

Recognising Indigenous customary law of totemic plant species: Challenges and pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Geographical Journal, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recognising Indigenous customary law of totemic plant species: Challenges and pathways
Published in
Geographical Journal, August 2019
DOI 10.1111/geoj.12320
Authors

Daniel F. Robinson, Margaret Raven

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 31%
Arts and Humanities 2 15%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,345,904
of 16,522,462 outputs
Outputs from Geographical Journal
#51
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,041
of 265,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geographical Journal
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,522,462 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.