You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Role for Gene Duplication and Natural Variation of Gene Expression in the Evolution of Metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Kliebenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 30% |
| Researcher | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,909,352
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#107,215
of 224,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,255
of 97,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#154
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.