↓ Skip to main content

宿便についての一考察.について

Overview of attention for article published in Kampo Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 204)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
宿便についての一考察.について
Published in
Kampo Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.3937/kampomed.66.173
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,566,584
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Kampo Medicine
#27
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,812
of 363,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kampo Medicine
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.