↓ Skip to main content

Endorsement of International Consensus Radiochemistry Nomenclature Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endorsement of International Consensus Radiochemistry Nomenclature Guidelines
Published in
EJNMMI Research, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13550-018-0469-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Elsinga, Angelika Bischof Delaloye, Arturo Chiti, Stefaan Vandenberghe, Francesco Giammarile, Ignasi Carrio

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 4 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,813,637
of 15,384,081 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#57
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,826
of 261,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,384,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them