↓ Skip to main content

Expression of Emotion in Eastern and Western Music Mirrors Vocalization

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
95 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of Emotion in Eastern and Western Music Mirrors Vocalization
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Liu Bowling, Janani Sundararajan, Shui'er Han, Dale Purves

Abstract

In Western music, the major mode is typically used to convey excited, happy, bright or martial emotions, whereas the minor mode typically conveys subdued, sad or dark emotions. Recent studies indicate that the differences between these modes parallel differences between the prosodic and spectral characteristics of voiced speech sounds uttered in corresponding emotional states. Here we ask whether tonality and emotion are similarly linked in an Eastern musical tradition. The results show that the tonal relationships used to express positive/excited and negative/subdued emotions in classical South Indian music are much the same as those used in Western music. Moreover, tonal variations in the prosody of English and Tamil speech uttered in different emotional states are parallel to the tonal trends in music. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the association between musical tonality and emotion is based on universal vocal characteristics of different affective states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 141 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Professor 14 9%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Arts and Humanities 14 9%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#514,132
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,054
of 225,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,253
of 169,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#87
of 3,570 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,570 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.