↓ Skip to main content

Enclosures as a land management tool for food security in African drylands

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Land Use Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Enclosures as a land management tool for food security in African drylands
Published in
Journal of Land Use Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/1747423x.2019.1636147
Authors

Gert Nyberg, Stephen M. Mureithi, Deborah N. Muricho, Madelene Ostwald

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,475,539
of 13,516,269 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Land Use Science
#84
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,377
of 167,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Land Use Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them