You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology Direct, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13062-019-0245-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Feargal Joseph Ryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 17% |
India | 2 | 7% |
Nepal | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 97% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
Computer Science | 6 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,252,664
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#97
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,694
of 312,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them