You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Role of Host Genetics in Susceptibility to Influenza: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033180 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Horby, Nhu Y. Nguyen, Sarah J. Dunstan, J. Kenneth Baillie |
Abstract |
The World Health Organization has identified studies of the role of host genetics on susceptibility to severe influenza as a priority. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the current state of evidence on the role of host genetics in susceptibility to influenza (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001380). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 27 | 28% |
United States | 5 | 5% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 60 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 92 | 94% |
Scientists | 5 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 26% |
Researcher | 28 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#525,150
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,220
of 224,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,317
of 169,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#88
of 3,567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.