↓ Skip to main content

Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0
Authors

Valeria Ciampa, Moritz Sirowatka, Sebastian C. Schuh, Franco Fraccaroli, Rolf van Dick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Professor 4 4%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 37 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 30 33%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 39 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,050,105
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,021
of 2,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,760
of 312,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.