↓ Skip to main content

Implantable device monitoring versus usual care for managing individuals with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implantable device monitoring versus usual care for managing individuals with heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013401
Authors

Kevin Koo, Caleb Ferguson, Liang-Han Ling, John GF Cleland, Sally C Inglis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#9,205,783
of 15,685,637 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,151
of 11,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,531
of 262,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,685,637 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.