You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major Role for Amphotericin B–Flucytosine Combination in Severe Cryptococcosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002870 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Françoise Dromer, Claire Bernede-Bauduin, Didier Guillemot, Olivier Lortholary, for the French Cryptococcosis Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 27% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,753,614
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,309
of 214,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,893
of 93,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#105
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.