↓ Skip to main content

Patient education for neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient education for neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005106.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Gross, Mario Forget, Kerry St George, Michelle MH Fraser, Nadine Graham, Lenora Perry, Stephen J Burnie, Charles H Goldsmith, Ted Haines, David Brunarski

Abstract

Neck disorders are common, disabling, and costly. The effectiveness of patient education strategies is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 367 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 13%
Researcher 46 12%
Unspecified 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Other 114 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 20%
Unspecified 53 14%
Psychology 25 6%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 49 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,113,732
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,331
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,896
of 117,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.