↓ Skip to main content

Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007945.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woo YL, Kyrgiou M, Bryant A, Everett T, Dickinson HO

Abstract

Gynaecological cancers are the second most common cancers among women. It has been suggested that centralised care improves outcomes but consensus is lacking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Librarian 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Other 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Unspecified 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,553,601
of 11,342,664 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,160
of 9,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,682
of 104,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,342,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.