You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Evolutionary Conservation and Expression of Human RNA-Binding Proteins and Their Role in Human Genetic Disease.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Systems Biology of RNA Binding Proteins
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1221-6_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1220-9, 978-1-4939-1221-6
|
| Authors |
Stefanie Gerstberger, Markus Hafner, Manuel Ascano, Thomas Tuschl, Gerstberger, Stefanie, Hafner, Markus, Ascano, Manuel, Tuschl, Thomas |
| Editors |
Gene W. Yeo |
| Abstract |
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are effectors and regulators of posttranscriptional gene regulation (PTGR). RBPs regulate stability, maturation, and turnover of all RNAs, often binding thousands of targets at many sites. The importance of RBPs is underscored by their dysregulation or mutations causing a variety of developmental and neurological diseases. This chapter globally discusses human RBPs and provides a brief introduction to their identification and RNA targets. We review RBPs based on common structural RNA-binding domains, study their evolutionary conservation and expression, and summarize disease associations of different RBP classes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,658,020
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,238
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,790
of 305,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#71
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.