↓ Skip to main content

Treating glabellar lines with botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex: A review of the science, the clinical data, and patient satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treating glabellar lines with botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex: A review of the science, the clinical data, and patient satisfaction
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2010
DOI 10.2147/cia.s9338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koenraad De Boulle, Steven Fagien, Boris Sommer, Richard Glogau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 17%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,413,141
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#555
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,990
of 104,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.