You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Imputing and predicting quantitative genetic interactions in epistatic MAPs.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Network Biology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-275-5, 978-1-61779-276-2
|
| Authors |
Colm Ryan, Gerard Cagney, Nevan Krogan, Pádraig Cunningham, Derek Greene, Ryan C, Cagney G, Krogan N, Cunningham P, Greene D, Ryan, Colm, Cagney, Gerard, Krogan, Nevan, Cunningham, Pádraig, Greene, Derek |
| Editors |
Gerard Cagney, Andrew Emili |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 38% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,923
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,842
of 117,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.