↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative antibiotics to prevent infection after first‐trimester abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative antibiotics to prevent infection after first‐trimester abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005217.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Low, Monika Mueller, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Nathalie Kapp

Abstract

There are two main strategies for the prevention of post-abortal upper genital tract infection: antibiotics given around the time of surgery for all women; and 'screen-and-treat', in which all women presenting for abortion are screened for genital infections and those with positive results are treated.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 68 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,374,034
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,260
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,573
of 170,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.