You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost effectiveness of community-based and in-patient therapeutic feeding programs to treat severe acute malnutrition in Ethiopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-10-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asayehegn Tekeste, Mekitie Wondafrash, Girma Azene, Kebede Deribe |
| Abstract |
This study estimated the cost effectiveness of community-based therapeutic care (CTC) for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in Sidama Zone, Ethiopia compared to facility based therapeutic feeding center (TFC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 23% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,135,085
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#215
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,792
of 161,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them