↓ Skip to main content

Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Gervin, Lucas A. Salas, Kelly M. Bakulski, Menno C. van Zelm, Devin C. Koestler, John K. Wiencke, Liesbeth Duijts, Henriëtte A. Moll, Karl T. Kelsey, Michael S. Kobor, Robert Lyle, Brock C. Christensen, Janine F. Felix, Meaghan J. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 27 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 34 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,580,752
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#442
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,768
of 353,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.