@Christ_Conserv @RevGregorySNeal @Jessz4Freedom @kevinmyoung It’s NOT a sin if you analyze scripture. Which is good, since people are BORN gay. Otherwise, it would imply God makes mistakes or created some people just to torture them. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB
@JasonFreed91757 @PinkNews There's an evolutionary basis for it: https://t.co/6F5awZGJEZ Also, there's plenty of studies to suggest it is genetic like: https://t.co/QxKOZDW0Qq https://t.co/gsWre9kvcy https://t.co/UQvA1KDmFI There's also a theory it's con
Se eram gémeos, e só um virou, é possível que em alguns casos seja possível apenas a influência ambiental, ou seja, ele tem razão e a escola virou-lhe a cabeça, mas não acredito que não haja trauma com ele misturado.
@mestra_do_ar @fredomercurio_ 99% dos nossos comportamentos não são regidos apenas por um gene, na verdade a maior parte das características são poligênicas. O maior estudo já feito mostrou isso. https://t.co/LQ2wYAbFlM
@talkingpupils @MaxALeite "E pessoas héteros que seguia doutrina religiosa de heterossexualismo mas largaram a religião e se tornaram gays?" Já tinham predisposição a isso. A evidência a favor disso existe, com atração homoafetiva sendo poligênica (causad
@Cherubino04 @JoshWehrme90663 @mananabaristanm @kevinmyoung People are born gay via genetics and prenatal molecular influences. He’s pretending his plan would be better than God’s, which borders on blasphemy. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@Cherubino04 @JoshWehrme90663 @mananabaristanm @kevinmyoung Yes, and we already showed Josh (here’s only one) the studies that show that God created people LGBTQ, from GWAS to molecular phenotype analyses. He just wants to make people angry to gain narciss
@JoshWehrme90663 @JasonMW45 @LoveyTex @kevinmyoung By the way, since science tells us LGBTQ is a combo of genetics and prenatal molecular influences, are you saying YOUR god screwed up, or that he created some people just to torment them? My God is bigger.
@WiesBielawski @Pan_Pawel2 @DanielWachowiak No i szczytem ignorowania przez Pana badań naukowych jest to że Pana link: https://t.co/rT2G28LLSg do artykułu z brukowca odnosi się właśnie do badania naukowego, które Pan twierdzi że nie istnieje: https://t.co/
@WiesBielawski @Pan_Pawel2 @DanielWachowiak Po pierwsze to jest artykuł z gazety po drugie odnosi się do jednego badania naukowego po trzecie to badanie naukowe we wnioskach stwierdza przeciwne wnioski: "Na zachowania seksualne osób tej samej płci wpływa
RT @meselelgbt: ❔Sıkça Sorulan Sorular ❔ ▫️Bu konu hakkında daha detaylı bilgi için Scince'da yayınlanan ''Large-scale GWAS reveals insigh…
RT @Norberto_BCN: Może następnym razem towarzysz Dorota Giebułtowicz z @ekaipl zajrzy do badań, nim wypowie się na jakikolwiek temat z medy…
Może następnym razem towarzysz Dorota Giebułtowicz z @ekaipl zajrzy do badań, nim wypowie się na jakikolwiek temat z medycyny/biologii? https://t.co/IATTo87y0L #katolicyzm #ciemnota #kłamstwa #katobolszewia #CzarnaZaraza
@ekaipl @Pontifex_pl Czemu pieprzycie niemedyczne bzdury na temat orientacji seksualnej? Nie jest żadnym sporem. Wystarczy zajrzeć do badań. https://t.co/uLanTDVgGn BTW, jak panowie księża (jak pan ksiądz profesor Sokołowski) wypełniają tą "czystość"? #k
@kuredhikuri https://t.co/08la8FPMWm This is the best I can find of recent research on this. "Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying
❔Sıkça Sorulan Sorular ❔ ▫️Bu konu hakkında daha detaylı bilgi için Scince'da yayınlanan ''Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior'' adlı makaleyi okuyabilirsiniz. 📌 Makale: https://t.co/ODFLApbvzn http
@grim_prime @kevinmyoung You mean scientific facts? Like findings from GWAS and molecular phenotype analyses that show some people are BORN gay? https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@WiesBielawski @DanielWachowiak Panu tutaj: https://t.co/tQSg1fBRS6
@WiesBielawski @Pan_Pawel2 @DanielWachowiak Szerokie badanie gdzie w uzasadnieniu jest stwierdzenie że przyczyną są różne nakładające się czynniki genetyczne oraz że nie ma wyjaśnia czy lub jak może środowisko wpływać na homoseksualizm. https://t.co/31er7
@samarinhoinho @wtv_a_li_en_ @Staralfur_lx É literalmente o que a ciência diz. Teu negacionismo é idêntico ao do crente. Boa leitura https://t.co/IDzuMpidgn
@unsafeturtle @TheJayUNF Truth. And in fact, since LGBTQ is largely genetic (combined w/ prenatal molecular influences), those who are anti-LGBTQ are spitting in God’s face telling Him that part of His creation sucks. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@CruzControl72 Thank you! So—since most of us who have studied gender genetics believe that LGBTQ is genetic (combined w/ prenatal molecular influences)—they are both saying THEIR design is better than God’s AND denying science. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@gillboyfish People go from straight to gay as they realize that they aren't attracted to women? I don't know what about this is so hard for you to understand. Here's a study I found in about 30 seconds, showing genetic relation to homosexuality: https://t
@TransverseCity @huntimack Oh, and please repent for basically saying that you believe God’s creation sucks and that you believe you would do a better job than God. People are BORN gay, exactly the way God created them! https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@PreachersPen @kevinmyoung Instead of accusing others of being ignorant and immature, why don’t you take a few genetics courses and wisen up yourself. People are BORN gay. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@wadethomasjr @kevinmyoung It’s wrong to condone people being who they were born to be? Is it a sin that you think your design is better than God’s design? https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@Catholi64501821 @kevinmyoung Please take a few genetic courses. You’re being a false witness. And worse, you’re telling God that you don’t appreciate His creation. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@AnimatorCrooked @WiggyStark @fasteronfire525 @TouchstoneJon @nakedpastor Everything is rooted in genetics somehow whether we've found it yet or not. And we are in fact finding it. And it's literally not Eugenics if people take on the duty themselves will
@UN_Women @free_equal When are you going to update the guidelines, to what is was in the past, a “personality disorder”, which is what it is?
@pedrojdoc Sabias que a homosexualidade tem origem genética e é hereditária?
“Twin studies and other analyses of inheritance of sexual orientation in humans has indicated that same-sex sexual behavior has a genetic component.” https://t.co/qFb51B0fvq
@768tdpvzvrTapp @Woofkoof @Franklin_Graham @realDonaldTrump “Leona” is a Russian bot. And, even Jesus would have invited people who are gay to the White House. After all He loves people exactly the way He created them! https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
h e h e https://t.co/5wU9E33PfG
gue baca ini takut salah, tapi ko yg gue tangkep semakin dekat kekerabatan relatives terhadap elu yg nonheterosexual, kemungkinan mereka juga nonheterosexual juga tinggi. anjir, gue takut adek gue bi, syaland ):
According to a 2019 scientific paper published in Science, researchers concluded that there is no single gene responsible for a person having same-sex attraction. Instead, similarly to physical and mental traits, sexuality varies because it is polygenic.
@Buntownik @Legaartis @Anakreontyk Osoby nieheteroseksualne były, są, i będą. Rodziły się, i będą się rodzić, choćbyście pękli i plackiem padli. Ot, genetyka 😄 https://t.co/HX6XYWQNl9
@JimSaranteas @WMyers1 @Franklin_Graham @calvinrobinson Agree. It’s none of their business—except that they’re hatred is dishonoring a God who created some people LGBTQ. In essence, they’re telling God they’d do it better! https://t.co/oanIMJMcLg.
@matttebbe @TheMuppetPastor We talk about loving our LGBTQ brothers and sisters citing genetics, but… https://t.co/oanIMJMcLg. 1/2
@patrykmichalski @a_niedzielski Naukowcy tego nie wiedzą. Pan Michalski i jego eksperci sprawę już przesądzili. (7) źródło: https://t.co/HwqPaGCNyS
@lgbtfreezone @laskowianka774 @PatrycjuszNRD Dokładniej jest tutaj: https://t.co/luXKMqdpgJ
@RevLarryBeane Hmmm, I’d suggest a few entry level courses in genetics. That is, unless you’re trying to demonstrate the exact opposite of Christian humility. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@nottut_paul @RevLarryBeane @ZachWLambert Agree. And from a genetics standpoint, variations are not a “birth defect” but the way someone is born—similar to being left handed. 1/2 https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
@CryptoDzejki @KorolukM @1972tomek Nie. Nie posiadają jednego takiego genu i nigdzie nie pisałem, że tak jest. Znów pokazujesz, że nie umiesz czytać. Jest to sprawa trochę bardziej skomplikowana. Geny mogą odpowiadać za między 8, a 25% przypadków.https://
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
RT @SinanAlper_: Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen…
Bahsettiği makalenin linki: https://t.co/Wl5I0PuQPY Sonuç kısmının ekran görüntüsünü koyuyorum. Eşcinselliği belirleyen tek bir gen yok, muhtemelen birçok gen tarafından belirleniyor demişler. Videoda anlatıldığı gibi değil yani. Etik diye bir şey var,
@Naturarekin_Bat @HavranMichal Pošli mi nejaký relevantný, kde je jednoznačne preukázaná vrodenosť sexuálnych variácii. Tu je originál, keď nie si schopný sa tam preklikať. https://t.co/oJacqzwlFK
RT @heureucs: E la genetica c'entra fino a una certa (https://t.co/WBHPzgZEmQ). Non si può parlare di gene gay (nello studio parlano di tan…
RT @heureucs: E la genetica c'entra fino a una certa (https://t.co/WBHPzgZEmQ). Non si può parlare di gene gay (nello studio parlano di tan…
E la genetica c'entra fino a una certa (https://t.co/WBHPzgZEmQ). Non si può parlare di gene gay (nello studio parlano di tante piccole variazioni nel DNA che non spiegano tutto il carattere). L'omosessualità non può essere solo dovuta alla genetica (vedi
@TFletch89 Read the actual study to know how complex genetic determinism is. They never say it is a choice. https://t.co/5I559ugfCP Similar to other diverse traits eg. there is no 'left handedness' gene. But a minority of people in every population are na
@zmartwychwsta @Moonlit_8 Pieprzycie bzdury, towarzyszu. Oczywiście, że nie ma "genu homoseksualności", bo orientacja seksualna jest poligenowa - informacja jest zapisana na kilku loci: I nie, badanie nie było sponsorowane przez "działaczy LGBT", tumanie
@zmartwychwsta Łapcie, tawariszcz: https://t.co/dKJM6JwS7x
RT @XPspatharivs: esto ya lo dijo Aristóteles
Science a publié une étude, le 30 août 2019, qui tord définitivement le cou à cette fausse idée d'un gêne gay qui prédéterminerai notre orientation sexuelle. https://t.co/weChhJ6ARL
@bmairs @mattnightingale You said it all. People are born LGBTQ. Not only does that not affect them, they are dishonoring part of God’s creation (and spitting in God’s face) by being hateful. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@Seb_A_Morris @MagaMeCrazy @mattnightingale Agree. People are born gay. When will these people start honoring God’s creation and stop spitting in God’s face saying their way would be better? https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@Godscontrarian @armer_elise @mattnightingale Wrong. I’d suggest you take a few genetic classes before you continue being a false witness. Being a false witness is something Jesus actually mentioned (unlike LGBTQ). https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@TRHLofficial Not just women. It's nearly universal that homosexuals and "transexuals" were abused as children. Science has proven that they weren't born that way: https://t.co/8kbwaJJnuM They were almost certainly groomed that way: https://t.co/3x7fuLh
@MrHash233 @krzysztofdzi3 Orientacja seksualna jest jak najbardziej czymś normalnym (jak kolor oczu czy leworęczność): https://t.co/OzQ6MxYr9P Warto doczytać nim się coś napisze (bo można wyjść na tumana i półgłówka).
@_Micro__ @CiudadCanaria Más o menos lo que dices es cierto, salvo la última parte, en donde mezclas supervivencia (a través de la reproducción) con inclinación sexual. Aun tomando la orientación y mirando si los genes tienen algo que ver, aquí indican (e
@GJuliusCaesar70 @Phirah79 @Butch30586594 @JosiahHawthorne Nope. As educated people we’re aware that people who are LGBTQ are born that way. We are simply honoring God’s creation! https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
RT @SekretSila: Falso. La orientación sexual tiene una heredabilidad bastante baja, solo alrededor de un 25% de la varianza es explicada po…
@Class350desiro @shaydailly @pika_shenx @UmmeAmm51222681 For those curious, you can read the study here: https://t.co/oVfWmhZjOl
RT @SekretSila: Falso. La orientación sexual tiene una heredabilidad bastante baja, solo alrededor de un 25% de la varianza es explicada po…
RT @SekretSila: Falso. La orientación sexual tiene una heredabilidad bastante baja, solo alrededor de un 25% de la varianza es explicada po…
Le está dando la razón al tuit citado, reconociendo que hay heredabilidad. Además, como todo el mundo sabe, no solo existe la genética como factor de lo dado. Hay más factores congénitos.
esto ya lo dijo Aristóteles
RT @neuronach: @RamonNogueras hasta donde conozco, el estudio más completo sobre la contribución genética https://t.co/RhQyTE7IYc Si bien…
Falso. La orientación sexual tiene una heredabilidad bastante baja, solo alrededor de un 25% de la varianza es explicada por genética. https://t.co/wsSNyZeujd
@alanguzam @eduardomenoni ¿Cuándo van a entender esos seres obtusos que nadie es homosexual por doctrina, lobby o ideología? El homosexual nace homosexual y la ciencia ya demostró que la genética es la base para su existencia, hay 4 genes involucrados en e
@RamonNogueras hasta donde conozco, el estudio más completo sobre la contribución genética https://t.co/RhQyTE7IYc Si bien puede jugar un papel, parece ser más relevante la concentración de dif. hormonas en el desarrollo intrauterino. https://t.co/Qz9wg
@horusbuto @Alberto_CNK @EIGranPatriarca Conclusión del artículo: "El comportamiento sexual entre personas del mismo sexo está influenciado no por uno o unos pocos genes, sino por muchos." https://t.co/LAlIEapZPN
@tentonnetongue It’s all speculation. What we know: https://t.co/oNSkpFOQOK
@Frownbear @JoshuaRueb85231 @howie_duwitt @CaitlinPacific You're literally a science denier. Your tears & frustration at the scientific facts are delicious 🤤 https://t.co/hoccye2GG5
@Frownbear @JoshuaRueb85231 @howie_duwitt @CaitlinPacific That's simply false. That's just completely wrong. Both genetics and hormones have been studied & neither of them have ever shown to be significant for sexuality. This is the largest study i
@jntaylor1701 @magaditos68 @ReallyAmerican1 Dude...there's no such thing as "born gay" lol! We know this as a scientific fact. It's not disputable. The main influence on sexuality are environmental & cultural factors. The biological component of s
@KendraIzzy @visitorsdigest @FaeJohnstone @bruce_arthur Let me know if you need the scientific papers on these facts. I have plenty available. For example here's a scientific paper showing that biology plays a non-determinative role in sexuality https://
@BertyJam @musgrove_dale @JuliaHB1 But we know for a fact that biological influences on sexuality are non-predictive and insignificant. We know this - it's an objective fact. Homosexuality isn't from birth - at all. https://t.co/hoccye2GG5
@FaizaTabassumR @waifuterf The genetic influence on sexuality is between 8 - 25% and the rest are environmental & cultural factors. The biology was found to be INSIGNIFICANT & NON-PREDICTIVE. It's a scientific fact which you absolutely cannot de
@TheVeqanWizard @TheYungHegelian 1) Yeah, this is the largest study examining the relationship between genetics and sexuality. It found genetics plays an insignificant non-predictive role in sexuality. It concluded that environmental & cultural infl
@Vera_Lesna Nie ma pojedynczego "genu homoseksualności", bo informacje o seksualności zapisane są na kilku loci: https://t.co/NjdX2WLtHm Tyle w temacie.
@Ania63672215 @Vera_Lesna Nie wiem, jakich bzdur pani słucha (pewnie z Kremla, bo to kalka wypowiedzi putlera), ale badania z genetyki medycznej pokazują jednoznacznie, że orientacja seksualna jest uwarunkowana genetycznie: https://t.co/NjdX2WLtHm
@BEAUTYR0MINA "La ciencia no ha determinado evidencia de condiciones biológicas o genéticas que demuestren por qué una persona nace así" Evidencia de influencia de genes en conjunto con otros factores: https://t.co/fFhYDsfmO3
@caspermuir @swampy2023 @JonniBoi1421 @PinkNews Continuing from number 1) Scientific research has repeatedly shown that environmental & cultural influences overwhelm the biological influences. The largest study on this topic clearly shows this. htt
@FANAttIC10 @iambryaen 1) Yeah, this is the largest study examining the relationship between genetics and sexuality. It found genetics plays an insignificant non-predictive role in sexuality. It concluded that environmental & cultural influences are
@mr_newk @Williamson_KB @Franklin_Graham God did make this person who they were meant to be. People are BORN LGBTQ. You are yet another of Franklin’s paid bots, but his vulnerable followers need to hear truth. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6
@JPaulNorton @_nomadic_soul Here’s some science for you. https://t.co/3SuL3pJbB6