@JarrydBartle @Alexgraenn @alexslego @unherd Nonsense, multiple gene candidates are linked to homosexuality; five genetic loci (fixed positions on chromosomes) correlate with same-sex activity: two appeared in men and women, two only in men, and one only i
@DuncanHenry78 Finally, when we look at attempts to determine genetic, hormonal or other innate causes of homosexuality - you get some fairly muddled research. There is no singular "gay gene" and even attempts at "genes" (plural) find plenty of intra-grou
@patameszaros @just_bored_owl @SeznamZpravy Je mnoho studií, co mají přibližně stejný závěr: https://t.co/K60AACswdH Table S4 - genetika: 32,4 % (největší studie ze všech) https://t.co/KrJ31g15AR genetika: 29 % https://t.co/fbNrzdYjid genetika: 26,5 %
@Therese99999 @nickmarra15 @DrChaffs @Kushbai @benshapiro It's a polygentic thing. The first published genetic casual link was established in '93 & most recently in '21 & '22 separate large scale studies found ~5 genes influential. https://t.co/
L'article : https://t.co/IWMSw3HXc8
@ClappedBurner https://t.co/8MY1rV5cd9 The research publication they cited
@LoopHaiti Si nou ta enterese li plis sou sa : https://t.co/s9LNyW3kOA.
@SirMosely @ConceptualJames Correct...there are supposed hundreds of thousands of them (not that it's relevant to the tweet here) https://t.co/2BI1vLLwWQ
@varnadoe_kim @01sandyshook @Philip_DT @libsoftiktok No such gene could exist. It's an urban myth that there is a 'gene' for this and a 'gene' for that (in most cases that is). Usually it's a complex mix of different genome wide loci or similar. Here are s
@BenP112233 @steven_t761 @emarque333 @achillesmason @libsoftiktok The science: - identical twins more likely to share the same sexuality than fraternal twins https://t.co/hS9vH95QPf - Meta analysis shows genome wide loci associated with same sex attraction
@FranceLumieres @VincePvince @LeRaptorWild Pour la partie génétique : https://t.co/86prdmNpFZ
@oneeyedsnake64 @1millionspiders @theserfstv A study done on half a million people found that sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors. Is this enough? https
RT @bakerjjw: REGARDLESS what the Bible may say about homosexuality if anything at all, which is doubtful. IT IS KNOWN since discovery of D…
@jrc99us @generic82656965 @stone_toss Yes, thank you for proving my point. It's literally in the first sentence. More on that same study here: https://t.co/TLyLgyhxen
@ArizonaK1m @realDailyWire 1 I will NOT tolerate eugenicist talking points, especially from a willfully ignorant cultists like yourself 2 there's no thing as a gay gene https://t.co/XRxJnwn57k 3 there's NO "gay babies" nor "trans babies" ONLY PEDOPHILES HA
@__mage0fmind__ Genetics accounts for only 25% of the variance in sexual orientation https://t.co/wzAr8yXLN4).
@BostonPilled Genetics accounts for only 25% of the variance in sexual orientation https://t.co/wzAr8yYjCC).
@JewishHindutva @ftmong00se Studies like these could potentially lead to state registries of queer people. Maybe less likely in Western nations, but still something to consider. https://t.co/sGMW7pKoZG This was the other thing I was thinking of. Not sure
@FreeThinker51_8 @myslozbir Żadnych, powiadasz... https://t.co/HUstakLKHN https://t.co/heRethyGcU
So it's fully social. "These aggregate genetic influences partly overlapped with those on a variety of other traits, including externalizing behaviors such as smoking, cannabis use, risk-taking, and the personality trait “openness to experience.”"
@mdowstfl I think the evidence is already fairly solid that it’s mostly a social thing. Even the genetics that play a role are things like openness to new experiences which is basically another way of saying it’s social. https://t.co/0pkWK2Rb7p
RT @bakerjjw: @pcollier79c @AboutLungCancer @thePumamama @kevinmyoung How God made them gay: https://t.co/0pDyHyBvpD
@ThomBlank @CJ_Cregg_Cook We haven't been researching it for as long, so we don't know quite as much, but we do have information indicating there is a genetic basis. https://t.co/Ptf7VazthL
@onomasticamente @MickeyLain Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., ... & Lichtenstein, P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365(6456), e
RT @bakerjjw: @HeraldOfPurity @CJ_Cregg_Cook Wrong. Gay is a condition of birth, 5-10% It is the result of exposure to prenatal hormones o…
@DavidMoMu Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., ... & Lichtenstein, P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365(6456), eaat7693. https://t
@Truth61211 @ZherkaOfficial Glad we agree that homosexuality is not a choice and is caused by both genetics and hormones interacting with the brain during fetal development. Just like heterosexuality. Shocking. https://t.co/ClFyPNxvId
@unite_organize @ZherkaOfficial Read it and weep https://t.co/ClFyPNxvId
@gulliwog @KatyMontgomerie Is same-sex attraction is ‘a natural part of our diversity as a species’ less strong than ‘very likely innate’? Looks like same meaning, different terms (https://t.co/Rjsmh4s0MV)?
@kaimarkaru @Mannavaht21 Nt geide seas esineb oluliselt rohkem vaimse tervise probleeme: https://t.co/q34pzNnsVq Aga adopteerimisel tuuakse arvatavasti sisse nn diskrimineerimine ja sellest vaadatakse üle. Samuti siis, kui loomulik ja omasooliste kooselu m
@ARanganathan72 There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex.https://t.co/F6FwlvKkFB
Les gènes auraient une influence sur l'orientation sexuelle. Ici : https://t.co/qk6VFptPxr Ici : https://t.co/6IwW2zUhD2 Ici : https://t.co/s5vz7tWrC6 Ici : https://t.co/sgVOZcsSIh Et ici : https://t.co/7cds71Dxta https://t.co/LJWYtitiYn
@SaltDestroyer @Slatzism What people prefer is what the person does and is like. Not their gender. Also https://t.co/dYaXkDyuGL You don't just suddenly become gay at some point in your life. You can't develop gayness at 50. You always were gay, it just ta
@F3r2005 @Ds_OutOfContext https://t.co/reCFWKxXPj https://t.co/wLJJTJfsbT https://t.co/Q3MNVldINQ https://t.co/Mqrei8476r "Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity (pdf)"
@poliitikasse @medSjenc See Melinda Millsi (heh - tema käe all on olnud mul rõõm kunagi elulemusanalüüsi tudeerida ) artikkel on lühikokkuvõte. Siin ka algne artikkel pikas versioonis, tasuta kättesaadav koos mahukate lisadega. https://t.co/M7mnCX3Pz8
@jdatooth @asoiaf_ftw2 @RobTheConqueror @krassenstein @RepMTG EDUCATE YOURSELF https://t.co/qdOIPj2hqY
@RobTheConqueror @jdatooth @asoiaf_ftw2 @krassenstein @RepMTG Ok, for your review https://t.co/qdOIPj2hqY
@Ferrisinte @chonkyleclerc @TevinJC https://t.co/RiKZRxvT4o you were saying
@jehan_hameed You should read more before sharing hate speech... This is from the paper that article from your link cites, INCORRECTLY. https://t.co/yg9oMQKtOv https://t.co/PiFggyHyqG
@DandrixH @nadie1920 @g_raixen @AgustinLaje GWAS a gran escala revela ideas sobre la arquitectura genética del comportamiento sexual entre personas del mismo sexo. -Último estudio que demuestra que no existe un solo gen gen, sino que varios influyen. http
@ChristineNiles1 @bradfjordd @OneMadMomBlog Does the lack of a single, "responsible" gene mean there is no genetic component? Absolutely not. To do so would also dismiss predisposition to other polygenic traits. https://t.co/VMutL9HYLQ
Without reading the paper I would bet my fortune that the main theme of the paper is that homosexuality would be posited to be a polygenic phenomenon. They wouldn't be allowed to publish the findings if the main thrust was that it was mainly sociological.
@LsSellers3 @VinceDaoTV @Gregnus_2023 Start here: https://t.co/p7sDYfxQnf
@alexhirakiri @BradWelton En aras de brindar una experiencia más completa y enriquecedora, permíteme proporcionarte un enlace adicional para que puedas profundizar en el tema si así lo deseas ( me da paja buscar mas fuentes ) 🐢: https://t.co/982qDawLzW.
@rougecoquin @Axawl_ @RichardMammouth Quelques trucs en liens : https://t.co/AmSUQzHetQ https://t.co/q2ttwVGczW https://t.co/hDU2NUlr3r
On the best evidence, when we talk about "gay genes" we're not talking about a real fixed thing - but a set of temperaments / influences which correlate (small, but statistically significant) with the social development of certain patterns of attraction.
RT @bakerjjw: Homosexuality is not a choice. As if 🙄 Medical scientific research https://t.co/0pDyHyBvpD https://t.co/lpFaka0EIp
@_lithp @mk_rowe @TheSkeptic4122 "Pursue sexual reproduction". Homosexuality isn't mainly about sex... and reproduction isn't the only reason for sex... https://t.co/BakO0WMHdd
@mustehcengazete @LonelyBoyUE @clausewitzpasha Ulan akademinin ana akımıysa bir tane makale işini çözmeli. https://t.co/62Y6x9DqIl Cinsel oryantasyonun genetik olmadığına dair makale. Şimdi doğuştan geldiğine dair makaleni bekliyorum.
@john_phlegar @literallyexists @dontbeafraid444 @SpiderKen1995 @DrLoupis The study linked in that article https://t.co/tG5ROHW8LN
@JamesATuckerDC @conleyc86 @buttonslives "The born that way myth has also been debunked..." That's not how I interpret the study at all. If anything, it says, "Born that way but in a complicated way." https://t.co/23gzPG9GTP https://t.co/yyRQ4dcXeI
@AnimeMoist @CalamariSteven yes i am ok, thank you. here is a meta analysis on this topic if u care to read it. it is pretty enlightening. and u should also know the difference between empirical and anecdotal evidence. it's pretty useful when u want to for
@PegaYCorre @RemyBonny @Europarl_EN @EmmanuelMacron @Bundeskanzler https://t.co/PrLhsMakPe genetics can explain between 8% and 25% of nonheterosexual behavior. The rest, they say, is explained by environmental influences, which could range from hormone exp
@Degen4896 @oriKCeteris @KharjoIRL @Fetch_Gero @Mediavenir okok, celle là ça te va alors ta majesté des sources? https://t.co/VAfv2RopFe
@GamerSemayas @vicentreves @smthomofobico Em realidade, os estudos sugerem que não existe um único gene gay, mas vários. E terapia de conversão não funciona. https://t.co/5BNitl6B4d
@tanha1358 @Mary_dehghanii جناب بیشعور تحقیقاتی انجام شد که نشون بدن همجنس بازی ژنتیکی هست و گرایشی ذاتی ولی کاملا این تحقیقات شکست خورد و اتفاقا نتایج برعکسو نشون داده شد یعنی اثبات شد همجنسبازی فقط و فقط از تایر جامعه هست و مثل روابط جنسی معمولی یک عمل ط
@KachalCheshmAbi تحقیقاتی انجام شد که نشون بدن همجنس بازی ژنتیکی هست و گرایشی طبیعی هست ولی کاملا این تحقیقات شکست خورد و اتفاقا نتایج برعکسی نشون داده شد یعنی اثبات شد همجنسبازی فقط و فقط از تاثیرات جامعه هست و مثل روابط جنسی معمولی یک عمل طبیعی و ذاتی نی
@KorolukM Jak skomentujesz najnowsze badania na próbie pół miliona osób, wg. których naukowcy nie byli w stanie stwierdzić istnienia genu odpowiadającego za homoseksualizm? A więc, skoro nie jest on genetyczny, jest on nabyty. https://t.co/STfiEqF7ki ht
@DanielM69823041 @Pedro92476670 @Personaje_Secun El problema con lo cita es que tergirversa el estudio porque ese estudio nunca habla de "herencia genética" habla de poligenetica por algo es un estudio GWAS https://t.co/AGef50BUS3
@AdeleKe84774028 @theplatform_nz Yet science says there is no gay gene and sex related genetics is low "genetic variants accounted for 8 to 25% of variation in same-sex sexual behavior" https://t.co/gJybD8VJ0D
@Kyd0G @Tawfiktweets @AlaaPatho سؤالي واضح مين هما عشان الدكتور وليد يعطيهم الاسم الثلاثي؟ والله احترمك يا كيدو بس تقول المثليه فيها شي علمي الصراحة لا تعليق!!!!!! يكفيني https://t.co/n2sVcYSiCn انا اصدق العلم 🙃
@czersku @JedrzejBorowski @TygodnikNIE W sumie to byłoby z tego więcej pożytku, bo chłopiec powtarza putinowskie koszały-opały. Czekam, aż będzie chciał "leczyć" piwnookich z ich koloru oczu, albo leworęcznych "leczył" na praworęcznych 🤣 https://t.co/QY9c
@RyomenSukunaX0X @BigDell1629 @rodolfocortez04 @freesoul7 @DailyLoud OK, I found a study it says you're wrong Here is the link: https://t.co/88Hz6RTS4a
@Maria1punto0 @nadie1920 GWAS a gran escala revela ideas sobre la arquitectura genética del comportamiento sexual entre personas del mismo sexo. -Último estudio que demuestra que no existe un solo gen gen, sino que varios influyen. https://t.co/iDqFVli8e5?
@DawidMulczynski @KONFEDERACJA_ @CTomczyk @SlawomirMentzen Ja już miałem okazję posłuchać bredni pana Mentzena na temat "zaraźliwości homoseksualnością" w USA, i mi wystarczy. Jako lekarz muszę stwierdzić, że @SlawomirMentzen pieprzy takie bzdury, że głow
RT @xavimiya: @VanyaThais No es una conducta, es una orientación y tiene factores genéticos https://t.co/7ylhBp5So3
@VanyaThais No es una conducta, es una orientación y tiene factores genéticos https://t.co/7ylhBp5So3
@FlordelosMilag6 Efectivamente, loquita, ningún gen gay sino VARIOS FACTORES GENÉTICOS, mejor deja de lloriquear y saca tu cita al Largo Herrera, saludos fanatica https://t.co/4R0eZKeLhS
@Jokeroinesquec1 @smthomofobico Está nesse estudo aqui, ó. https://t.co/5BNitl6B4d
RT @Norberto_BCN: - O genetyce orientacji seksualnej: 1.https://t.co/VAdtObGhoM 2.https://t.co/bco0dgve6R 3.https://t.co/r4XXkmBvAg 4.https…
@DiruiLee 哥们真的, 没读过就不要露怯,那篇文章的结论是不存在起决定性作用的单个“同性恋基因”。而不是基因不影响。 我把文章链接放在这, 自己去读读conclusion第一句: Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. https://t.co/4Hjlu4v7ep
RT @KarbonSays: @cbassg16 @DejaRu22 When did you choose to be straight? Also being gay and straight are genetic. https://t.co/ClFyPNxvId
@GrungusJungus @djAmorsoul @KatyMontgomerie @BBCWorld @lewis_goodall Plenty of studies that look at that. It’s believed to be an interaction between biological and environmental factors. But listen, even if it was a choice, that would be *entirely* fine.
@WBurchnall @CTVNews 🤣😆 ok this is pointless, if you cannot even debate based on fact than don't make ignorant comments. Sexual orientation is not biological https://t.co/gPE32U70Va
@cbassg16 @DejaRu22 When did you choose to be straight? Also being gay and straight are genetic. https://t.co/ClFyPNxvId
When did you choose to be straight? Also being gay and straight are genetic. https://t.co/ClFyPNxvId
@X2TAKER_YT @KenzoG3000 @RightWingCope https://t.co/C5BiaUoN4Y But, assume this is totally inaccurate and being gay is 100% a matter of environment. Why would that make it wrong?
@Dubau2 @BradGrant30 @CRShort81 https://t.co/0gVWFM8EW9 Study composed of over 500000 people linked genetics to one's sexuality.
@SeyiStudiox @Youngboyyy38 @simplegbemi I'm assuming this is Ganna et. al? It's the only recent study with half a million I can find. https://t.co/EUKSNDqDHJ https://t.co/dE5xQc0NgA
@nightraven800 @ACEBOY_BILLY @BastianKezzif @xack101 @InternetH0F https://t.co/uE8shnrJAR Was literally tweeted earlier in the thread
@TheHeathens_ @nightraven800 @ACEBOY_BILLY @xack101 @InternetH0F https://t.co/Wym3zAUC1D There’s genetic factors that might make someone more likely to be or open to homosexuality, but there is no gay gene. Different people having different personality tr
@MoFo74239435 @SheBearRawr @CarymaRules You didn't know that it is common in life across the planet until just now. I have proof, but what will you say then? That's it's somehow flawed or biased? It is simply the placement of m/f specific genetic code and
@notunlikeadream @amersurveyctr @dcoxpolls “…We found in both sexes that same-sex sexual behavior was positively genetically correlated with several psychiatric or mental health traits…”https://t.co/x9pTS6Em1D
@ChuckyMcGee380 @AtheistsL Mental illness is more common in gay people. https://t.co/mJboE7h799
@Lilwings03 @DrMichaelLBrown That would be an absurd conclusion today. Sadly, being left-handed was once demonized. We’re making the same mistake again. Here’s the scientific research👇 https://t.co/511n2XEHwc 2/2
@Laurenc49920876 @MDSJR4 @DrMichaelLBrown Sexual orientation is not a choice either. As a straight person, can you turn your attraction for the opposite sex on/off? Was there ever a time in your life when you consciously chose to be attracted to the opposi