↓ Skip to main content

Corsi, Fenwick and Gramsci: How bloggers and advanced analytics are changing the National Hockey League

Overview of attention for article published in International Review for the Sociology of Sport, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corsi, Fenwick and Gramsci: How bloggers and advanced analytics are changing the National Hockey League
Published in
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, August 2019
DOI 10.1177/1012690219869192
Authors

Stephen W Sheps

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,014,198
of 13,602,993 outputs
Outputs from International Review for the Sociology of Sport
#94
of 461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,358
of 212,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Review for the Sociology of Sport
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,602,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.