The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protocol for evaluation of neurotrophic strategies in Parkinson’s disease-related dopaminergic and sympathetic neurons in vitro
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biological Methods, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.14440/jbm.2016.124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shane V. Hegarty, Aideen M. Sullivan, Gerard W. O’Keeffe |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,255,873
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Methods
#4
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,933
of 366,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Methods
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them