You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Blunting neuroinflammation with resolvin D1 prevents early pathology in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11928-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paraskevi Krashia, Alberto Cordella, Annalisa Nobili, Livia La Barbera, Mauro Federici, Alessandro Leuti, Federica Campanelli, Giuseppina Natale, Gioia Marino, Valeria Calabrese, Francescangelo Vedele, Veronica Ghiglieri, Barbara Picconi, Giulia Di Lazzaro, Tommaso Schirinzi, Giulia Sancesario, Nicolas Casadei, Olaf Riess, Sergio Bernardini, Antonio Pisani, Paolo Calabresi, Maria Teresa Viscomi, Charles Nicholas Serhan, Valerio Chiurchiù, Marcello D’Amelio, Nicola Biagio Mercuri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
United States | 3 | 18% |
Norway | 1 | 6% |
Isle of Man | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 30 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 51 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 31 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 60 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,276,244
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,523
of 57,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,567
of 350,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#530
of 1,477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.