↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for morphea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for morphea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005027.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia V de Albuquerque, Brenda NG Andriolo, Monica RA Vasconcellos, Vinicius T Civile, Anne Lyddiatt, Virginia FM Trevisani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Unspecified 9 9%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Unspecified 10 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,396,282
of 15,046,038 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,091
of 11,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,541
of 260,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,046,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.