The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011749.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Burry, Brian Hutton, David R Williamson, Sangeeta Mehta, Neill KJ Adhikari, Wei Cheng, E. Wesley Ely, Ingrid Egerod, Dean A Fergusson, Louise Rose |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 19% |
| Scientists | 15 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 510 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 10% |
| Researcher | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 93 | 18% |
| Unknown | 208 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 10% |
| Unknown | 230 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#564,890
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#934
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,421
of 353,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.