↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in health and disease: fooling Mother Nature?

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics in health and disease: fooling Mother Nature?
Published in
Infection, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s15010-019-01351-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Bilal Abid, Calvin J. Koh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,745,045
of 15,879,304 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#607
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,003
of 266,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,879,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.