↓ Skip to main content

From a Performance Measure to a Performance Evaluation Tool: Conceptual Development of the Equity and Inclusion Assessment Tool (EIAT)

Overview of attention for article published in Justice System Journal, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
From a Performance Measure to a Performance Evaluation Tool: Conceptual Development of the Equity and Inclusion Assessment Tool (EIAT)
Published in
Justice System Journal, September 2019
DOI 10.1080/0098261x.2019.1656421
Authors

Fred L. Cheesman, Kathryn Genthon, Douglas B. Marlowe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Psychology 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#11,436,917
of 14,424,902 outputs
Outputs from Justice System Journal
#58
of 90 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,882
of 257,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Justice System Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,424,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.