↓ Skip to main content

The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Kothari, Debbie Rudman, Maureen Dobbins, Michael Rouse, Shannon Sibbald, Nancy Edwards

Abstract

Planning a public health initiative is both a science and an art. Public health practitioners work in a complex, often time-constrained environment, where formal research literature can be unavailable or uncertain. Consequently, public health practitioners often draw upon other forms of knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 3%
Canada 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 297 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 18%
Researcher 51 16%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 70 22%
Unknown 57 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 24%
Social Sciences 46 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 8%
Computer Science 24 8%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 68 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,964,569
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#386
of 1,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,951
of 165,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.