↓ Skip to main content

Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004421.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melina L Willson, Lucinda Burke, Thomas Ferguson, Davina Ghersi, Anna K Nowak, Nicholas Wilcken

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 37 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,579,827
of 19,033,718 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,814
of 11,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,840
of 275,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,033,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.